Xbox Mod Chip | Loans | Electricity Suppliers | The eBay Song | Just Holden Commodores
Dear Leader [Archive] - ZGeek

PDA

View Full Version : Dear Leader


Grumblefish
24-11-2003, 01:55 PM
I just feel like clearing up some misconceptions a lot of you may have, so I decided to post this paper on the glorious and beloved Kim Jong Il:

Dear Leader
Democratic Philanthropist or Heartless Misanthrope?

Ever since its inception, the ruling Korean Worker's Party has come under heavy criticism from abroad, with many reputable figures decrying the current North Korean regime as a brutal, totalitarian dictatorship that grinds its constituents into dust. Yet, in stark contrast to this view, millions of citizens who live under the regime worship the party, devoting their lives to the success and progress of its glorious ideals. At the head of the controversy today is the enigmatic Kim Jong Il, successor to his father and hero of the people, Kim Il Sung. These two are regarded as terrible dictators to the bulk of people outside of North Korea, yet known by various affectionate terms by the vast majority within.

In making an unbiased review of the contemporary Dear Leader, both sides of the debate must be inspected. A major hurdle in coming to an acceptable conclusion is the lack of information available, and contradictions in what is known, as North Korea has always by nature been a very secretive society. If the opinions that the North Koreans project are to be believed, and who would know better than the regime's subjects themselves, then the Dear Leader truly is a living saint, guarding his wards from filthy, foreign rogue nations, while keeping their minds pure with Juche socialist ideology. In the other corner, however, there are some hateful foreigners and treacherous expatriates raising their voices, claiming that he is a careless playboy who is willing to sacrifice the lives of his people for his own personal, sadistic enjoyment. Needless to say, the true character of the Dear Leader probably lies somewhere betwixt and between these two extremes.

Finally, if there is to be a true representation of the Dear Leader as a person in his own right, then this discourse needs to forget the country and party at one point, and focus solely on the personality and experiences of the great figure himself. What of his friends, his family? How was he raised, is his reputation deserved, and how does he spend his time? Verily, all of these questions cannot be conclusively answered due to the aforementioned lack of reliable information, but they must be tended to as best can be.

The Dear Leader was born in Siberia on the sixteenth of February, 1942, and was originally known by the Russian name of "Yura". His father was the famous freedom fighter, Kim Il Sung, and his mother Kim Jong-Suk was also an active revolutionary. During his very early years, the Dear Leader lived and played amongst the children of his father's comrades, spending his time in a nursery. By his seventh birthday, the Dear Leader entered the recently liberated northern section of Korea, taking up residence in Pyongyang and starting education in the respectable school of Namsan. By all measures, he seems to have had a decent early childhood, save for the death of a younger sibling in a pond accident.

Unfortunately, his life took a turn for the worse when, after his father had failed to free the southern half of the Korean peninsula from the oppressive and destructive imperialist clutches of Syngman Rhee's evil US-backed regime, a UN invasion captured Pyongyang. The Dear Leader was forced to flee with his mother to Manzhou, and could not return until Chinese troops avenged his brave countrymen and pushed the foreign imperialists back across the 38th parallel. With the offenders expelled from North Korea, the Dear Leader was able to resume his education, and graduated secondary college in the sixties. Following on from secondary college, the Dear Leader was given a most marvelous military education, and it is for this that he is often referred to as the "Respected and Beloved General". The Dear Leader also graduated from the Great Leader Kim Il Sung University, having studied Political Economics for four years.

Making his debut into the professional realm, the Dear Leader was awarded a position on the Organisation and Guidance department of the North Korean government. The Dear Leader worked here for a whole decade, and it is during his time here that he was groomed as his father's successor. By 1973 he was declared the "Leader of the Party and the People", and within a year made several major political moves, including his issuing of the "Ten Principles". The “Ten Principles” strengthened his subjects resolve and loyalty to their fatherly overlords, the Korean Worker's Party, with the Dear Leader heading that governing body. As well as his own political decrees and actions strengthening his power, many other major political figures began allying themselves with the quick-witted Dear Leader during this period, increasing his already impressive power base greatly. The transition of power seems to have been rather smooth, although it has been noted that the Dear Leader ruined several people’s reputations in order to secure his political ascension.

Since the seventies, the Dear Leader has slowly taken over more and more responsibility from his father, practically running the country himself during his father's later years. Keeping in line with Confucian tradition, however, the Dear Leader kept himself somewhat behind the scenes until his father’s death, so as not to upset people. In 1997, he was given his father's old position as chairman of the Korean Worker's Party, and was the most powerful man around. 1998 saw a re-election and convening of the Supreme People's Assembly, and the Dear Leader was of course re-elected to his position in the National Defence Commission, supposedly due to his extreme popularity. As time has progressed to the present, he has continued to defend the North Korean people from outside imperialism, and maintained the country's glorious solitude.

His successes are hotly contested, however, with defectors and dirty imperialists daring to suggest that the North Korean paradise falls short of being a bed of roses. They offer several seemingly rational arguments against the Dear Leader, such as the claim that the Dear Leader is anything but democratic. For this point to be disputed, we must firstly define democracy. Merriam-Webster tells us that the term democracy finds its roots in Greek language and at its most basic can be explained as the rule of the majority. The challenge of enacting democracy is properly discovering the wish of the majority, and carrying it out. Several methods have sprung up over the years, with representative democracy being one of them. A basic form of representative democracy can simply be defined as the vesting of power in one person, who represents the wishes of all his constituents. Indications that power has been democratically vested in the governor of the people can be the likes of elections, mass demonstrations, and other signs of support for the ruler.

Claims that democracy ensures human rights should also be dispelled by noting that all democracy is at its core is the rule of the majority. While it is perhaps true that human rights should be ensured, this act is hardly inseparable from democracy, as democracy is not inherently good. If the majority of the people wish to see a good man hung, then that good man’s hanging is democratically sanctioned. Whether or not the Dear Leader is a benevolent ruler who assures his citizen’s rights is not the issue at stake here, but rather whether or not he is democratic and derives his power from the majority. Democracy can be brutal and totalitarian if it is what the people call for, no matter what their motivation for doing so.

While it was previously noted that the Dear Leader has been elected to many of his positions, and according to KCNA repeatedly re-elected, the validity of the elections themselves has come under fire, with claims of violence and threats against those who dare oppose the Dear Leader's wishes. Even if this were to be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, which it is far from, free elections are not the only thing supporting the Dear Leaders claim to democratic statesmanship. The North Korean populace regularly shows their support for their overlord, participating in massive parades and demonstrations, and building him tremendous structures which reach high into the sky. They show their support for their leader through blood and sweat, devoting their lives, and often losing them, to worshipping him. While outsiders claim that they do this because they have a proverbial gun to the head, even North Korean defectors whose thoughts are conveyed by Kongdan Oh, those who have the greatest motivation to decry the Dear Leader and his regime, admit that he is, at bare minimum, truly respected by his people. If his greatest enemies call him respected, then one must ask what of his greatest fans, the loyal North Korean people?

Grumblefish
24-11-2003, 01:57 PM
If the defectors themselves must admit that the Dear Leader is, at worst, universally respected, then what reason is there to believe that the shows of popular support for him are anything but sincere? This point is countered through claims of brain-washing, but it is a flimsy countering at best. "Brain-washing" is an inescapable reality of learning, as there is no completely unbiased education system. The North Korean people are taught to love the Dear Leader, true, but every government makes sure its education systems support them. The hypocrisy is plain to see when a government that ingrains one set of opinions in its inhabitants has the gall to bemoan another government because it shares a different view with its citizens. Ultimately, there is no real reason to believe that the Dear Leader is at all less than democratic, as even the staunchest opponents of the regime will admit that he is universally respected by his wards, and the wards themselves show almost nothing but complete devotion to the Dear Leader.

Another note on this point is that if a leader is truly universally loathed, as has been said about the Dear Leader, then he will inevitably come to sorrow. No completely unpopular ruler can maintain rule forever, and their rule soon shows cracks. Once a ruler loses his support base, it is not long before he loses his head, and history has given us many precedents, from the many worldly monarchs, to more contemporary rulers such as Stalin, whose moral bankruptcy led to his downfall at the hands of his own men. It bears testament to the people’s universal love of the Dear Leader that one can barely discern even the slightest weakening of his support base. It is also worth noting that other controversial leaders have been loved by their subjects, as was the case with Ivan the Terrible. At one point, when Ivan felt he had lost his mandate to rule, he abdicated, only to have the overwhelming majority of the Russian populace rise up and beg him to retake his rightful place on the throne, and lead them ever onwards.

Thus proven to be a grand democrat, it must now be explored as to whether the Dear Leader is a philanthropist or misanthrope at heart. While the incredible Dear Leader has been somewhat responsible for many deaths, it is not quite clear as to whether they should be seen in a negative or positive light. Did the Dear Leader and Respected and Beloved General kill his people because he loved them, or because he hated them? If the Dear Leader orders people to be turned into camp dust, it should be seen as to whether or not they were destroyed for respectable purposes. For example, if a thousand people are forced into giving up the ghost so that the remaining 20+ million may have memorable reasons not to betray the democratic Dear Leader, then it was not a completely irresponsible, and by extension negative, slaughtering. Nothing is entirely evil, and even the most excessive acts of genocide can have their positive aspects. The death of a minority for the progress of the majority is one such act that at first may appear inhumane, but if carried out with tact is actually a philanthropic act ordered only by those leaders most devoted to their subjects.

In maintaining order and stability, a government must often hurt and hinder as well as help its people. North Korea has many positive and rare aspects, of which almost all are maintained by the Dear Leaders unique leadership methods, and wise decisions. For instance, the people of North Korea are renowned for their comradery, always willing to help out their fellow North Korean in what ways they can. This close-knit communal lifestyle is perhaps the ultimate example of universal philanthropy and selflessness to have existed. Would it be as strong today if it was not for the Dear Leader's decision to avoid a free market and more liberal governing fashion? Of course it would not; history has proven as much by what has occurred in other societies. It is thanks to the strong exhorting of positive values under the command of the Dear Leader that the people have the fortune to live in such a caring environment, where living together in beautiful harmony transcends human greed and selfishness in almost all cases. People have died as a result of the Dear Leader avoiding the disgraceful imperialist's foreign-aid noose, and many others have died to remind the other North Koreans how they should live, but given the state of the country's society it can be claimed that the killings are for the better, and seek only to strengthen the country.

Therefore, given the above conclusion, the Dear Leader's governing style can be likened to a skilled surgeon amputating a gangrenous limb from a sickly man. Certainly, the limb shall be lost and the patient wounded, but ultimately he will survive the experience and be better off as a result of the operation. The Dear Leader has proven that the poverty and starvation rampant in North Korea are really equality and fraternity in disguise. The joy and happiness so apparent to the North Korean people are masquerading around as sickness and disease to the outside world, causing an unwarranted denouncing of the Dear Leader's regime. Nowhere have so many people been kept so safe from decadence and greed, and with a prize so precious and beautiful as the North Korean paradise of bliss and fraternal tranquility, none can truly blame the Dear Leader for crushing all who would dare risk the stability of the regime. Undeniably, the Dear Leader has created something so marvelous that we as imperfect beings barely deserve to experience it, and can never properly appreciate it. He is far more than a democratic philanthropist, and even an unbiased account such as this cannot deny that the deification of the Dear Leader is entirely justified, for he is the closest thing this world has seen to God himself. He has turned oppression into safety, poverty into comradery, starvation into motivation, and deserves every kind word he receives.

tikdoph
24-11-2003, 02:08 PM
http://www.zgeek.com/albums/uploads/thanks_for_the_info.jpg

Grumblefish
24-11-2003, 02:27 PM
You're welcome. It's sad that a lot of the filth that inhabit this world think poorly of the Dear Leader, and I feel it partly my duty to try and present the truth to them.

nosedog
24-11-2003, 02:46 PM
[This post has been edited in the interests of thread expediency]


Dear Grumblefish

Whatever you said was wrong. I am an idiot. Please flame me.

nosedog

nosedog
24-11-2003, 02:49 PM
PS - I promise I will be outraged and indignant at your spiteful, venomous reply. :D

tikdoph
24-11-2003, 11:55 PM
:D

Grumblefish
27-11-2003, 05:04 PM
Originally posted by nosedog
[This post has been edited in the interests of thread expediency]


Dear Grumblefish

Whatever you said was wrong. I am an idiot. Please flame me.

nosedog

Where the hell does rancid scum like you get off? What I've presented to your intellectually challenged mind in this thread is the greatest man to have ever graced this planet with his presence. Make a note in your atrophied brain that I said grace, rather than deign, because he has grasped his duties with both hands, giving every task he encounters everything he has to offer, and has never once complained. The Dear Leader is a man so glorious that he has devoted his life to taking excessive wealth from the irresponsible masses so that they may truly appreciate one another, and live free from the corrupting capitalist greed and imperialism. He is the sheperd, beckoning his flock to tranquility, to a sacred North Korean paradise.

Yet, here you come, seemingly oblivious to the Dear Leader's kingly deeds, befouling this forum by decrying this veritable Messiah. You're nothing but deluded filth in a sickeningly human form; liquified fecal matter that has dripped out of the worm encrusted anus of the morally bankrupt capitalist hegemony, spewing your disgraceful rubbish in a spasticated fit of imperialist hysteria. Jealousy has corrupted your cold, black Westernised soul, leaving you a dirty, revolting husk of a person, doomed to a life of criticism and unproductivity. It's fair to say that when compared to the Dear Leader that you so dare to criticise in your repugnant little imperialist fashion, you've never accomplished a single thing over the course of your pathetic little indignant life.

So what are we left with now? A pitiful whisp of a person going by the name of Nosedog, trying to act acrimonious but falling far short of the line, just as he does at everything else in life. It is a mystery to me as to why you even bother to keep on breathing, as you personify the expression "waste of oxygen", seeming to exist only for the purpose of draining resources in the careless, capitalist fashion that your ghastly form was born into.

I only wish that the Dear Leader himself was here to bear witness to your pitiable tantrum against him, suggesting that my honest words were wrong, for no doubt he would've torn you limb from limb, the words exiting his mouth rending your body to pieces, leaving you rueing the very day you were splurted out in a hail of piss and shit into this sick, perverted world. Alas, he is a busy man, and it is but I who am left to deal with your desperately doleful hide. I will retire, to weep for humanity, and pray to whatever loathsome entity is responsible for our existance.

tikdoph
27-11-2003, 08:30 PM
What's a nubian?

Pirate
27-11-2003, 10:30 PM
Hey grumble

nosedog
28-11-2003, 08:48 AM
OH NOES! Grumblefish flamed me! I never expected that to happen!



(Maybe if I argue some more, he'll accept defeat)

Grumble you are wrong wrong wrong!

tikdoph
29-11-2003, 01:35 PM
http://www.zgeek.com/albums/uploads/suckup.jpg