The Sanitized World of GW Bush

[Mr. Bungle]

Really long, but worthwhile article about Bush's world, trip to Europe, and two excellent letters (one from a German and one from an Iraqi).

From Mother Jones (http://motherjones.com/news/dailymojo/2005/02/potemkin.html)

excerpt:

Bush's Potemkin World
By Tom Engelhardt

"The great motorcade," wrote Canadian correspondent Don Murray, "swept through the streets of the city… The crowds … but there were no crowds. George W. Bush's imperial procession through Europe took place in a hermetically sealed environment. In Brussels it was, at times, eerie. The procession containing the great, armour-plated limousine (flown in from Washington) rolled through streets denuded of human beings except for riot police. Whole areas of the Belgian capital were sealed off before the American president passed."

Murray doesn't mention the 19 American escort vehicles in that procession with the President's car (known to insiders as "the beast"), or the 200 secret service agents, or the 15 sniffer dogs, or the Blackhawk helicopter, or the 5 cooks, or the 50 White House aides, all of which added up to only part of the President's vast traveling entourage. Nor does he mention the huge press contingent tailing along inside the president's security "bubble," many of them evidently with their passports not in their own possession but in the hands of White House officials, or the more than 10,000 policemen and the various frogmen the Germans mustered for the President's brief visit to the depopulated German town of Mainz to shake hands with Prime Minister Gerhard Schroeder.

...

[Nodbugger]

So basically one liberal columnist ,1 German , and 1 Iraqi said they think Bush is sheltered.

There is a simple explanation for what they do. Idiots. Anyone that cannot answer any of these questions for themselves is just stupid. Any question that you would ask Bush that you don't already know the answer to, is not worth asking. Because you already know the answer. If you don't know the answer you are infact stupid.

The rest of the article just talks about how the move in a bubble. Well with the massive amounts of extremists idiots who would love nothing more than to see something bad happens to Bush, I would never want this to happen to any president, they have to do this because people out there are just complete idiots. More than half this forum fits that description. I call them idiots because they are. They don't give straight answers, they have no clue what the want, yet the won't shut the fuck up. Sit down and shut up, if you have something constructive then you can talk. If you talk out of turn get the hell out, if you saying something that in no way helps the situation get the hell out. That is why Bush doesn't want anything to do with people who are against him. Because he knows no matter what he tells them they will bitch and moan, and the worst part is no one can tell you way. They are just stupid. No rationality can be found in them.

[StudMuffin]

So basically one liberal columnist ,1 German , and 1 Iraqi said they think Bush is sheltered.

There is a simple explanation for what they do. Idiots. Anyone that cannot answer any of these questions for themselves is just stupid. Any question that you would ask Bush that you don't already know the answer to, is not worth asking. Because you already know the answer. If you don't know the answer you are infact stupid..

Noddy have you ever been wrong?

We know the answer is "yes" but i ask because it would be beautiful to see you admit it.

[Nodbugger]

Noddy have you ever been wrong?

We know the answer is "yes" but i ask because it would be beautiful to see you admit it.


No , I have never been wrong here.

[Asmodeus]

No , I have never been wrong here.

i think I just shit my pants in laughter over that one.

[gunsella]

No , I have never been wrong here.

can i mention monty python's canadian heritage? oops, i just did.

[Nodbugger]

can i mention monty python's canadian heritage? oops, i just did.

If you saw that in context it was stated as a question.

[Directed]

Noddy, could you please become a liberal? Your lack of thought and inability to form a coherent argument, plus the added inability to ever admit you are wrong would match better with the liberal mind-set.

Just consider it, ok?

[Asmodeus]

to put it simpler, for noddys sake:

Dear Noddy

Please fuck off and die

signed:
Everybody.

[Bostonmess]

Ratified. :D

[darns]

Seconded

[dwarfthrower]

Noddy, could you please become a liberal? Your lack of thought and inability to form a coherent argument, plus the added inability to ever admit you are wrong would match better with the liberal mind-set.

Just consider it, ok?

Definately.... I sooooo do not want him on my team... Just countering his "own goals" is a battle in itself.

[Juice Biscuit]

Noddy, could you please become a liberal? Your lack of thought and inability to form a coherent argument, plus the added inability to ever admit you are wrong would match better with the liberal mind-set.

Just consider it, ok?



Please at the rate he's going he'll get his own radio spot just after Rush, but just before the Hannity and O"Reilly.

[Nodbugger]

Please at the rate he's going he'll get his own radio spot just after Rush, but just before the Hannity and O"Reilly.

At least I will have a higher income than everyone on this forum put together(except me of course).

[Mr. Bungle]

and here i was hoping for some sort of interesting conversation.

turns into another classic noddy thread.

twit

[dilligaf]

to put it simpler, for noddys sake:

Dear Noddy

Please fuck off and die

signed:
Everybody.
Dear Asmodeus,

I would like to remove my name from that letter please.

I need to have some form of argument here.

kthxbye

[s3raph]

Ah Noddy, a lot of people on this forum are IT specialists. Some of the highest paid professionals in the western world. I would rather you didn't decide that because we don't live in America we must live in a third world nation.

[Mr. Bungle]

any other comments on the article? It's sad that Noddy was the only one to actually say anything. And even though I don't agree with him at all, I am glad that he took time to read it and say something about it (although I doubt he read all of it, it's really long and I don't think he can pay attention to it for so long; and there are lots of big polysyllabic words too!)

Since I actually live in Germany I can say that it isn't only that person who wrote the letter who feels like that here. Most people have a serious problem with Bush, but not with the American people. They think Bush is a cowboy who runs roughshod over all those against him.

I completely agree. His little trip here was nothing more than gladhanding with Schroeder and shutting down Mainz for a day. His townhall meeting - a cornerstone of the whole trip - was cancelled because Germans will not prepare questions ahead of time for politicians. If anything, the German public dislikes Bush even more now.

[JediKnight]

EDIT: Sorry, just rembered this is the discussions forum. I'll try to restrict my postings to proper arguments, and leave the flaming in other threads.

[JediKnight]

His townhall meeting - a cornerstone of the whole trip - was cancelled because Germans will not prepare questions ahead of time for politicians. If anything, the German public dislikes Bush even more now.
This is why i've long since grown tired of watching such interviews. They interviewers don't get a chance to ask interesting questions.

[Enos]

At least I will have a higher income than everyone on this forum put together(except me of course).

So privates make a fair bit then?

[Enos]

Also to add to discussion, I was under the impression pretty much all political "debates" and "open sessions" were like this nowadays, regardless of the side.

God forbid you should have someone who disagrees with the person in power's policies asking questions...

[Mr. Bungle]

Also to add to discussion, I was under the impression pretty much all political "debates" and "open sessions" were like this nowadays, regardless of the side.

God forbid you should have someone who disagrees with the person in power's policies asking questions...

While not technically a debate, I think British Parliament is fairly open and unscripted. Tony Blair has to endure the grilling of the opposition party when he addresses them. I think it is fairly similar here in Germany too.

I would love to see Bush have to deal with that. How does it work in Australia?

[bund]

At least I will have a higher income than everyone on this forum put together(except me of course).


Sorry Noddy your dream of becoming the 'Great American Rent Boy' is but a fading star.The price for pimply chubby teenage american arse is way over priced Nodbugger. Aficionados know that for a good bit of fresh teen poop-shootin it is cheaper to go to south east asia, or considering the NAFTA agreement, over the border to mexico.

I think you should just stick to what you know best, that is knobing off your Dad's army buddies for a fiver and a hand full of twinkies, until you get enlisted or contract AIDS and die.

We are all watching

[katana]

It kinda reminds me of Bush's visit to Canberra, most of the streets he "could possibly travel on" were blocked for hours, The only senator who "dared" ask him contreversial questions was unconstitunially banned from parliment and the biggest crowd was north of the airport to see that the fucker "actually left". The only physical lasting thing from his visit is the peace sign painted on the Kings Ave bridge that the govt tried to paint over the morning of his trip around Canberra, I still chuckle to myself as I drive over it on the way to work.

[Scumbag]

While not technically a debate, I think British Parliament is fairly open and unscripted. Tony Blair has to endure the grilling of the opposition party when he addresses them. I think it is fairly similar here in Germany too.

I would love to see Bush have to deal with that. How does it work in Australia?


When Bush came to Australia, Our media was banned from interviewing him, and question time in parliament was cancelled for the first time in 105 years. As katana said, one senator did speak up, and was banned from speaking again, another female senator attempted to pass him a letter, and was physically prevented from doing so.


Ironically, around the same time, the leader of the Chinese Communist Party was in town, and actively encouraged our media for holding press conferences, interviews etc.

So it seems GWB either really is living a sheltered life, too illiterate to hold a conversation with journalists, or all of the above.

[Nodbugger]

It is because of your mentality. You will ask stupid questions that obviously have no answer or you would ask questions you already know the answer to. And even if he did answer the question it would still never be good enough for you. So why bother if those asking questions are going to act like little bitches the whole time, look as this thread. You are all being little whiny bitches and you never even asked a question yet.

[Asmodeus]

At least I will have a higher income than everyone on this forum put together(except me of course).

that noddy, i something I can guarantee will never happen.

[Up_All_Night]

It is because of your mentality. You will ask stupid questions that obviously have no answer or you would ask questions you already know the answer to. And even if he did answer the question it would still never be good enough for you. So why bother if those asking questions are going to act like little bitches the whole time, look as this thread. You are all being little whiny bitches and you never even asked a question yet.

dude, get a clue, dont go saying that shit
listen to when he answeres unscripted questions in your copuntry by your people, he bumbles along and says something stupid, that makes no sense, unrelevant like he has no clue

[Nodbugger]

dude, get a clue, dont go saying that shit
listen to when he answeres unscripted questions in your copuntry by your people, he bumbles along and says something stupid, that makes no sense, unrelevant like he has no clue


Examples?

[btwong]

examples....
fuck have you had your head up your arse or what nodbugger?

http://www.bushisms.com/index1a.html

[Juice Biscuit]

Examples?


http://www.bushisms.com/index1a.html
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/blbushisms.htm




Oh, please, please say useless without video.

[Up_All_Night]

thats ya counter argument, find an example of him unscripted answering a question properly

[Nodbugger]

thats ya counter argument, find an example of him unscripted answering a question properly

Those are just things he has said that have been taken out of context.

Get me a full transcript of a question and answer segment and show me which answers fit your description.

[Juice Biscuit]

Free rep to the first person who posts the tibal sov vid

[btwong]

Q] Good morning. My name is Mark Trahant. I'm the editorial page editor of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer and a member of the Native American Journalist Association. (Applause.) Most school kids learn about the government in the context of city, county, state and federal. And, of course, tribal governments are not part of that at all. Mr. President, you've been a governor and a President, so you have a unique experience, looking at it from two directions. What do you think tribal sovereignty means in the 21st century, and how do we resolve conflicts between tribes and the federal and the state governments?

[BUSH]: Tribal sovereignty means that, it's sovereign. You're a -- you've been given sovereignty, and you're viewed as a sovereign entity. And, therefore, the relationship between the federal government and tribes is one between sovereign entities.

link (http://wampum.wabanaki.net/archives/001076.html)

[Up_All_Night]

i was trying to find that quote! haha

[Enos]

Q] Good morning. My name is Mark Trahant. I'm the editorial page editor of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer and a member of the Native American Journalist Association. (Applause.) Most school kids learn about the government in the context of city, county, state and federal. And, of course, tribal governments are not part of that at all. Mr. President, you've been a governor and a President, so you have a unique experience, looking at it from two directions. What do you think tribal sovereignty means in the 21st century, and how do we resolve conflicts between tribes and the federal and the state governments?

[BUSH]: Tribal sovereignty means that, it's sovereign. You're a -- you've been given sovereignty, and you're viewed as a sovereign entity. And, therefore, the relationship between the federal government and tribes is one between sovereign entities.

link (http://wampum.wabanaki.net/archives/001076.html)


Yes, that's the one I was thinking of

[bund]

Get me a full transcript of a question and answer segment and show me which answers fit your description.



So you TOO want your bloody questions and answers before you say anything. Are all you Americans complete mindless bastard children of Minnie Mouse and Ronald McDonald?

I have a script for you

Nodbugger: " Hi I am Nodbugger"

(laughing to himself)

Nodbugger: " Please kick me in the nuts cause I am a fucking goose"

Say that verbatum for me Noddy next time you talk to someone. That will save me coming over to the US to kick you in the nuts myself.

Shit for brians arse bandit

[SuCC]

"If you're a younger person, you ought to be asking members of Congress and the United States Senate and the president what you intend to do about it. If you see a train wreck coming, you ought to be saying, what are you going to do about it, Mr. Congressman, or Madam Congressman?"
LOL....

"I want to appreciate those of you who wear our nation's uniform for your sacrifice."
heh

[Up_All_Night]

gotta just love how noddy decided to leave the convo at this point, probably to go play with G.I. Joes in his sandbox

[Nodbugger]

gotta just love how noddy decided to leave the convo at this point, probably to go play with G.I. Joes in his sandbox

I live in a different time zone.

[Nodbugger]

Q] Good morning. My name is Mark Trahant. I'm the editorial page editor of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer and a member of the Native American Journalist Association. (Applause.) Most school kids learn about the government in the context of city, county, state and federal. And, of course, tribal governments are not part of that at all. Mr. President, you've been a governor and a President, so you have a unique experience, looking at it from two directions. What do you think tribal sovereignty means in the 21st century, and how do we resolve conflicts between tribes and the federal and the state governments?

[BUSH]: Tribal sovereignty means that, it's sovereign. You're a -- you've been given sovereignty, and you're viewed as a sovereign entity. And, therefore, the relationship between the federal government and tribes is one between sovereign entities.

link (http://wampum.wabanaki.net/archives/001076.html)


Now can you tell me , other than that he stutters, what was factually wrong about what he said?

[Nodbugger]

LOL....


heh

What is wrong with the first quote? There was obviously a question proposed before that.

And the second one, a simple comma could make that sentence make perfect sense, if you heard him say it you wouldn't have posted that.

[Juice Biscuit]

Now can you tell me , other than that he stutters, what was factually wrong about what he said?



He didn't say he was wrong, he just said that he stutters along saying stupid shit?


So stop trying to wiggle your way out of it, you asked for evidance, it was provided the jury has found him guilty, time to move on.

[Up_All_Night]

Now can you tell me , other than that he stutters, what was factually wrong about what he said?


where was the answer to

and how do we resolve conflicts between tribes and the federal and the state governments?

what the actual question was about and he didnt asnwer.

if i go to you,
"What do you think international relations means in the 21st century, and how do we resolve conflicts between nations? "

a suitable answer is not, "international relations are relations that happen internationally."

its called dodgiung the question cause you're a dumb ass.

its what dumbasses do on tests when they dont know the answer, not state anything that isnt mentioned in the question.

[Scumbag]

It is because of your mentality. You will ask stupid questions that obviously have no answer or you would ask questions you already know the answer to. And even if he did answer the question it would still never be good enough for you. So why bother if those asking questions are going to act like little bitches the whole time, look as this thread. You are all being little whiny bitches and you never even asked a question yet.


Love it. Noddy got so flustered up at the fact that the president of his so called "land of the free" was muzzled up from talking to any Australians on camera on his own accord, while a communist leader was doing the exact opposite that he avoided defeat and resulted in spurting out some babble about the people on this forum and somehow tried to make out that we represent ALL Australians, including our polititions and journalists...

What a dumb cunt! :p

[SuCC]

"I want to appreciate those of you who wear our nation's uniform for your sacrifice."

It was slightly funny. He also said "I want to appreciate" rather than "I appreciate". By saying I want to can mean you are not doing it at present. It is almost implicit that "but I can't" were silent words to finish the sentence. Not really polished and it shows. Sure, everyone knows what he is supposed to mean, but this way he can get away with saying something under the guise of: my speaking is goofy.

If you're a younger person, you ought to be asking members of Congress and the United States Senate and the president what you intend to do about it. If you see a train wreck coming, you ought to be saying, what are you going to do about it, Mr. Congressman, or Madam Congressman?"
you should be they. Bush: A younger person should be asking the congress and president their opinion of what "you" the younger person is intending to do, like they know what you are intending, but you don't know what you're intending.

Train wrecks don't come. They happen. Still I know what he meant, but the funny thing is here you are in his little analogy watching a train wreck coming and you are asking a congressman or transsexual congressman what they are going to do about it. Now that is comedic genious! :p Most of what Bush says is funny. I don't hold it against him but h should be polished when the occasion is deserving ie the military quote above.

I'm not that bothered about the -man/men extension to describe a female of a profession, but it is hilarious in this instance when he says Madam Congressman

[jak]

... if you have something constructive then you can talk. If you talk out of turn get the hell out, if you saying something that in no way helps the situation get the hell out.

Coming from you?

http://forum.zgeek.com/showpost.php?p=514034&postcount=48

[jak]

It is because of your mentality. You will ask stupid questions that obviously have no answer or you would ask questions you already know the answer to. And even if he did answer the question it would still never be good enough for you. So why bother if those asking questions are going to act like little bitches the whole time, look as this thread. You are all being little whiny bitches and you never even asked a question yet.

Excuse me? How can you speak on behalf of the media/parliament of Australia?

[Nodbugger]

Excuse me? How can you speak on behalf of the media/parliament of Australia?

I'm talking about who the post was directed to. Which is you, and people on this forum in General. Australia's parliament has nothing to do with what Bush did the past week. German citizens would have just asked the type of questions I described.

[jak]

I'm talking about who the post was directed to. Which is you, and people on this forum in General. Australia's parliament has nothing to do with what Bush did the past week. German citizens would have just asked the type of questions I described.

Okay. It came directly after the "When Bush came to Australia" post hence the assumption. You should quote the post you are replying to, else everyone will assume its the post above - particulary when you are often vague in your posts.

So you are speaking on behalf of all German citizens then?

[Hairyman]

jak, jak, jak....naughty, naughty...don't play with logic in front of the Nodbugger, it just makes him cry.

[Mr. Bungle]

jak, jak, jak....naughty, naughty...don't play with logic in front of the Nodbugger, it just makes him cry.You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Hairyman again.

tee hee

[Juice Biscuit]

Don't worry fellas, he wont come back, and if he does he will only quote someone else in the thread without addresing the fact that he was wrong.

[Nodbugger]

Okay. It came directly after the "When Bush came to Australia" post hence the assumption. You should quote the post you are replying to, else everyone will assume its the post above - particulary when you are often vague in your posts.

So you are speaking on behalf of all German citizens then?


I am not talking on behalf of them, I am saying that these are the types of questions that will end up getting asked.

The German people are almost all anti-war. So who would make up most of the questions? Anti-war people. I have been to this forum for a while and I know a few people who are anti-war. You have no fucking clue what you want. You contradict yourself every time you talk. You ask stupid questions that have obvious answers or no answer at all. And you get mad and say "No blood for oil" when you don't get the answer you want, which you already know is the wrong answer, but you will not let it go. Because you are all sick and in need of some serious medication.

[Nodbugger]

Don't worry fellas, he wont come back, and if he does he will only quote someone else in the thread without addresing the fact that he was wrong.

I have never been wrong ,shit face.

[Juice Biscuit]

I have never been wrong ,shit face.



Look out Nostradamus, the future turned out exactly like I said it would.

[SOC]

I have never been wrong

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!! :banana:

[Mr. Bungle]

I have never been wrong ,shit face.


this is just getting stupid. you say the same shit all the time too no matter how good of a counter argument someone gives you.

i posted this article in the Discussion forum so it could be discussed, not dismissed with idiotic babble and then flamed incessantly afterward. if you don't agree with something, that is fine, but at least construct a decent argument and post it accordingly.

and gang, just ignore his ranting as flaming (and carefully worded counter arguments) both seem to only encourage him.

[jak]

I am not talking on behalf of them, I am saying that these are the types of questions that will end up getting asked.

The German people are almost all anti-war. So who would make up most of the questions? Anti-war people. I have been to this forum for a while and I know a few people who are anti-war. You have no fucking clue what you want. You contradict yourself every time you talk. You ask stupid questions that have obvious answers or no answer at all. And you get mad and say "No blood for oil" when you don't get the answer you want, which you already know is the wrong answer, but you will not let it go. Because you are all sick and in need of some serious medication.

It starts with a "few people". Then its "YOU have no clue...", "YOU contradict EVERY time ...", " YOU ask stupid questions...". "YOU get mad...", "YOU will not let go...", "YOU are ALL sick...".

You sound like one extremely paranoid person.

A "few" of us are anti war (but I think its more that a few of us are anti Bush invading Iraq) quickly becomes 'we are "all" sick'.

I have never met someone so blindly irrational as yourself.

You are 18 correct? So you have finished school? What are you doing with yourself, Nodbugger?

[jak]

I have never been wrong ,shit face.

Never been wrong, but made a mistake (by your own admission), hey Nodbugger?

http://forums.zgeek.com/showpost.php?p=501185&postcount=24


google: "define:mistake"

- a wrong action attributable to bad judgment or ignorance or inattention
- an understanding of something that is not correct
- An error or misunderstanding
- wrong answer

google: "define:wrong"

- incorrect: not correct


Sorry, Hairyman, there I go again, trying to apply logic, where logic doesn't exist.

[Nodbugger]

this is just getting stupid. you say the same shit all the time too no matter how good of a counter argument someone gives you.

i posted this article in the Discussion forum so it could be discussed, not dismissed with idiotic babble and then flamed incessantly afterward. if you don't agree with something, that is fine, but at least construct a decent argument and post it accordingly.

and gang, just ignore his ranting as flaming (and carefully worded counter arguments) both seem to only encourage him.

No one has come up with a decent counter argument, that is what I have been saying this entire post!

[Nodbugger]

Never been wrong, but made a mistake (by your own admission), hey Nodbugger?

http://forums.zgeek.com/showpost.php?p=501185&postcount=24


google: "define:mistake"

- a wrong action attributable to bad judgment or ignorance or inattention
- an understanding of something that is not correct
- An error or misunderstanding
- wrong answer

google: "define:wrong"

- incorrect: not correct


Sorry, Hairyman, there I go again, trying to apply logic, where logic doesn't exist.


Do you happen to remember what that post was about?

If all you can find is a grammar mistake, I say I win.

[Juice Biscuit]

Well there was that comment about the US flying jets overseas every day after WWII, also the part about the pres being able the dismiss Habous Corpus (sp?) not knowing that congress has to also sign off on it.

[Nodbugger]

Well there was that comment about the US flying jets overseas every day after WWII, also the part about the pres being able the dismiss Habous Corpus (sp?) not knowing that congress has to also sign off on it.


I meant planes, and you fixated on jets. I also said the president can suspend it, but congress must approve it.

[Juice Biscuit]

I meant planes, and you fixated on jets. I also said the president can suspend it, but congress must approve it.


You said jets, the whole point of the argument was about jets, the US flying planes after WWII isn't much of a statement as most countries were flying planes well before then.



Oh and you didn't say anything about congress till I brought it up, you used good old Abe Linc as a reference without knowing that the courts later said that his suspension was ruled unconstitutional.

[Nodbugger]

You said jets, the whole point of the argument was about jets, the US flying planes after WWII isn't much of a statement as most countries were flying planes well before then.



Oh and you didn't say anything about congress till I brought it up, you used good old Abe Linc as a reference without knowing that the courts later said that his suspension was ruled unconstitutional.

I said he did, and that the president can do it. Just because I never mentioned congress doesn't mean he can't do it.

[Enos]

I said he did, and that the president can do it. Just because I never mentioned congress doesn't mean he can't do it.

I can fly


















in an aeroplane

[Mr. Bungle]

No one has come up with a decent counter argument, that is what I have been saying this entire post!You never supplied a decent argument to the original article so there was nothing to refute other than your inane comments:
So basically one liberal columnist ,1 German , and 1 Iraqi said they think Bush is sheltered.

There is a simple explanation for what they do. Idiots. Anyone that cannot answer any of these questions for themselves is just stupid. Any question that you would ask Bush that you don't already know the answer to, is not worth asking. Because you already know the answer. If you don't know the answer you are infact stupid.

The rest of the article just talks about how the move in a bubble. Well with the massive amounts of extremists idiots who would love nothing more than to see something bad happens to Bush, I would never want this to happen to any president, they have to do this because people out there are just complete idiots. More than half this forum fits that description. I call them idiots because they are. They don't give straight answers, they have no clue what the want, yet the won't shut the fuck up. Sit down and shut up, if you have something constructive then you can talk. If you talk out of turn get the hell out, if you saying something that in no way helps the situation get the hell out. That is why Bush doesn't want anything to do with people who are against him. Because he knows no matter what he tells them they will bitch and moan, and the worst part is no one can tell you way. They are just stupid. No rationality can be found in them.So people have been responding to your ability to call other people idiots. You never attempted to address this article and dismissed it outright because it goes against what you believe. That's totally fine, but please at least offer me some reasons other than "he is an idiot." If I want that type of analysis I can go to the elementary school down the street and ask those kids there. But then again, they might be more informed than you are.

There is a simple explanation for what they do. Idiots.Oh and you can't say that someone does idiocy. It's not a verb.

[banga]

? do people answer his posts just so they can claim fame to having rubbed his nose in it ? what was the original post about ? hey noddy i think they get a sexual pleasure whenever they answer back at you , so maybe you better not post anything , then they can settle back into their lonely existence :)