Cell Phones | Advertising | Mortgages | Loans | Home Loan
My ex best friend and my ex [Archive] - ZGeek

PDA

View Full Version : My ex best friend and my ex


~vjay~
27-04-2005, 01:07 PM
I went to court yesterday for family court matters (my ex is trying to get access and I have sole custody) and other than only being there for an hour after it takes an hour & a half to get there, I got to see who wrote affadavits up for my ex saying he is nice & normal and wants to see the kids, and helped with basic care, oh, and is safe being near kids

My ex best friend said this.
(I stopped talking to her after she kept being friendly with my ex after he tried to kill me and she was supposed to be my friend)

What pissed me off though wasnt that she still kept in contact with him after all what he did to me, that was bad enough(see the worst relationship thread all about him I wrote for details (http://forums.zgeek.com/showthread.php?t=30773&page=6&pp=15) ), it is the fact that at the end of the affadavit it said that she believes the allegations we are making are not true, bitch she is.(he molested our son on access visits when my son was 4yo)

Why would I make my son see sexual assault counsellors for, for fun and games?

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrr

(This is the same person who used to tell me to leave him then the next time I saw her tell me I should be grateful because he had gotten me a house, hypocrital, also when I left I took the playstation I won with me and she said I should let him have it after he had the whole house, every single stick of furniture we owned, and 2 cars while me & 2 kids had nothing)

sperm
27-04-2005, 01:30 PM
Is there any way at all that ur ex-friend had a thing for the psycho-ex-bf ??
I read it, and keep thinking she wanted him, thats why she drove a wedge in between.

Like, why should she care if u took the ps ? Why is she still keeping in contact with him even now ?

<worried look....

VangaloRR
27-04-2005, 01:45 PM
She sounds like a prize mongol...don't be to suprised if you find out she is pregnant to your ex in the near future...

MisterBishi
27-04-2005, 05:56 PM
I reckon they indulge in a few frames of poo snooker at the weekend too.

tikdoph
27-04-2005, 06:08 PM
I reckon Vicki is a great judge of character.

*laff*

Sagacious
27-04-2005, 06:34 PM
Was he ever investigated for the molestation of your son?

~vjay~
27-04-2005, 06:41 PM
Nope, unfortunately my son was only 4 with speech and other problems when it happened and we did try to get him once to tell the police but when we took him there he wouldn't say a word, turns out he thought his father was there because he last saw his dad being taken away by police.
When we explained it too him later on we did try to get them to find out but by then the police thought we had put him up to it, grrrrrrrr

And by the time I found out it had been over 3 months previously and any evidence of it would of been long gone, by then my son had turned 5.
He did have sexual assault counselling by a lovely lady who treats kids and she told me without a doubt she knows his father did do it to him, I never read any of her notes and basically know only what my son told me happened when he first told me, which isn't much because I was too scared to hear the rest of it, just the bit I heard made me feel sick inside.

Sagacious
27-04-2005, 06:47 PM
does your ex best friend have children and do you suspect her of having a relationship with your ex husband?

wolfpac181
27-04-2005, 06:56 PM
Ultimate revenge is finding a way to get a person Herpes.
Tricky part is not getting it yourself:D

And try to pick better styles of men for relationships, not just for you. Domo-kuns and kittens ya know.

~vjay~
27-04-2005, 07:07 PM
does your ex best friend have children and do you suspect her of having a relationship with your ex husband?

She has 3 children, and if she is stupid enough to want him she can have him, I haven't spoken to her for quite a while and I bet she has fallen for his I'm innocent" spiel hook line and sinker.

And try to pick better styles of men for relationships, not just for you
This is true, I am in another crappy relationship, at least this one isn't a pedophile, lol

Sagacious
27-04-2005, 07:21 PM
If she has falen in with him and you have properly grounded suspicions of him being unsafe around children don't you owe it to her kids as a human being to report that danger to the Child Safety Authorities and cite your boy's counsellor as the basis of those suspicions.

Just a thought

~vjay~
27-04-2005, 07:27 PM
I don't think that would work,
he has never been charged for it and I couldn't even get copies of the files for court, my solicitor and the court appointed child pyscologist could read them but not even photocopy them with my permission, the privacy act was cited as an excuse.

Sagacious
27-04-2005, 07:29 PM
I don't think that would work,
he has never been charged for it and I couldn't even get copies of the files for court, my solicitor and the court appointed child pyscologist could read them but not even photocopy them with my permission, the privacy act was cited as an excuse.
Department of Child Safety has more prvasive techniques than litigants before the Family Court and to boot you are not spending a dime it is your tax dollars at work.

MC SoD
28-04-2005, 10:24 PM
omg this is why i HATE family law.

So many cases involve the woman swearing 100s of Affidavits about how the ex sexually abused the kid, then the man says the same thing about her new bf... they both drag the kids to cop shops, film them saying shit about it, encourage them to say things (put words into the kids mouths)

I'm not surprised the cops thought you put the child up to it

"This is true, I am in another crappy relationship, at least this one isn't a pedophile, lol"

Want attention much? How many parents can say "lol" at the end of any comment relating to whether their child has been molested? If you think the allegation is true, and you can make jokes, well, welcome to the Family Court of Australia, enjoy your stay for the next 5 years and the wondrous effects on your child's wellbeing.

Jimma
28-04-2005, 10:30 PM
Were it my child, and my ex-husband (and I were a woman, because I'm not gay, not that there's anything wrong with that) I'd be spending less time joking about such a bastard on these internets, and spend more time hiring someone to kill him painfully.

Reprobate
28-04-2005, 10:44 PM
This is true, I am in another crappy relationship, at least this one isn't a pedophile, lol

Stop what you're doing, get off the internet, get rid of Mr Crappy Relationship, and start writing your affidavit.

Sagacious
28-04-2005, 10:53 PM
omg this is why i HATE family law.

So many cases involve the woman swearing 100s of Affidavits about how the ex sexually abused the kid, then the man says the same thing about her new bf... they both drag the kids to cop shops, film them saying shit about it, encourage them to say things (put words into the kids mouths)

I'm not surprised the cops thought you put the child up to it

"This is true, I am in another crappy relationship, at least this one isn't a pedophile, lol"

Want attention much? How many parents can say "lol" at the end of any comment relating to whether their child has been molested? If you think the allegation is true, and you can make jokes, well, welcome to the Family Court of Australia, enjoy your stay for the next 5 years and the wondrous effects on your child's wellbeing.

Look I think you're exagerating a little there about the 5 years maybe in a very few exceptional cases 5 years in the system can be achieved but in my experience the ones that go from go to woah normally take between 2 and 3 depending on complexity.

The ones in the Federal Magistrates Court usually take less than 2 years.

~vjay~
28-04-2005, 10:58 PM
Do you really think that I think this is one big joke?

If you knew half the shit I had put up with you would be amazed I hadn't fallen apart by now, even though a lot of bad stuff has happened to me & my family.

I have been going to court trying to stop my ex for over 2 years, before that was 2 years of his father taking me to court, this was mainly for his sons benefit when his son was locked away & I stopped access,
Legal Aid is funding this mess, on both sides, they made me put a caveat on my house on condition of funding this, in total this going to court has been going on for over 4 years and I am petrified, YES PETRIFIED that my legal aid is going to run out as they stick a cap on funding and are stupid enough to pay for my ex to take me to court.
What happens when I do run out of funding, the way this is heading it is going to trial which can go on for a week and I wont have any money to pay for this.

Yep, this is one big joke, I am happy to run back and forth to Melbourne which takes over an hour, run all over the place getting pyscologists reports done, affadavits done, mess up my kids lives doing this because this is all fun and games.
(if you can't see I am being sarcastic I am sorry now, this is directed at mainly one person who posted 2 or 3 posts above this)

MC SoD
28-04-2005, 11:06 PM
Sagacious: 2 to 3 years is still ridiculously long, and the people who like to throw allegations around and swear millions of Affidavits usually drag it out longer

Vikki: Then have some counselling or mediation and don't go through it all. If you *really* think he's an abuser, offer supervised access, he's going to get at LEAST that anyway, and if you don't believe it, let him have access - which is probably what he WILL get it in the end.

It's not a joke, so stop messing around, grow up and compromise. You'll reach the same result and save a lot of time, money, effort and heartache.

Sagacious
28-04-2005, 11:13 PM
Sagacious: 2 to 3 years is still ridiculously long, and the people who like to throw allegations around and swear millions of Affidavits usually drag it out longer

Vikki: Then have some counselling or mediation and don't go through it all. If you *really* think he's an abuser, offer supervised access, he's going to get at LEAST that anyway, and if you don't believe it, let him have access - which is probably what he WILL get it in the end.

It's not a joke, so stop messing around, grow up and compromise. You'll reach the same result and save a lot of time, money, effort and heartache.

I never said that the time it took wasn't ridiculously long I just said 5 years might be a bit of an exageration. I can't deny that the lead times are ridiculous but they are what they are because the Family Court is under resourced for the level of work it is asked by the community to do.

It is the petty disputes and the courts indulgence of the more ridiculous cases which self represented litigants (by and large) bring before the court which tend to clog the system.

Most Lawyers I deal with (not all but most) acknowledge that Family Law disputes are about damage control not about winning or losing because in the Family Law jurisdiction there are no winners and with that in mind most of us work our rings out to try and get negotiated settlements in matters.

Statistically only 3%-5% of all matters initiated in the court proceed to a final hearing with a settlement rate of between 95% and 97% I think that is bloody good unless you are one of the 5% to 3%

MC SoD
28-04-2005, 11:23 PM
Good on you for doing it anyway. I wouldn't.

Sagacious
28-04-2005, 11:24 PM
Good on you for doing it anyway. I wouldn't.
cheers 12 years and counting

Reprobate
30-04-2005, 07:42 PM
Look I think you're exagerating a little there about the 5 years maybe in a very few exceptional cases 5 years in the system can be achieved but in my experience the ones that go from go to woah normally take between 2 and 3 depending on complexity.

The ones in the Federal Magistrates Court usually take less than 2 years.

I think MC SoD means five years dragging on in and out of courts, not five years for one application. At least that's my impression.

August 2000 it started for me. And once a year the ex gets itchy feet and wants to move interstate. My first court experience was to get her BACK to NSW because she done a disappearing act.

I'm about to go to court AGAIN. But this time I'm in pole position. I have residence of the kids now. Even though the court orders say she does. She willingly handed them over and moved interstate without them. The court orders also state that their residence not be moved from the Newcastle area.

Now she's having a... I won't say a change of heart, she has a black lump of coal in her chest cavity where everyone elses heart would normally be, she's having a change of mind.

Mid May I'm in court for a directional hearing. I made the application. The ex refused to agree to any consent orders. By then it'll be 6 months that the kids have been living with me full time. And in that time she rings once a fortnight if they're lucky. She's sent one postcard to each of them. And she won't give us her actual address in Queensland. Which has made serving her with papers a bit of a hassle. But that was sorted out just recently. In a cruel twist of fate for her.

The kids don't want to go back to her. They don't want to move to Queensland. They don't want to go back to her if she comes down here. And yes, anyone in my position would say that, but in this situation and I believe after a Family Report the court counsellor will also know it to be true.

The ex wanted the kids for the second half of the holidays just gone. But refused to let me know where she would be taking them. So I told her I was refusing to hand them over.

Which of course meant there would be a showdown of the battle of the wills.

She travelled from Far North Queensland to pick up the kids, and a few days before arriving she sent me a letter, outlining the dates that we had agreed on, and stating again that she would not tell me where she was taking them.

So at five minutes to midday i had her served with the court application and affidavits at our arranged meeting place at McDonalds. She blew a gasket and told the server of the documents that she was going to report me to the police for not turning up with the kids (mind you this was five minutes before i was due to arrive). and she took the papers but then tried to give them back. and refused to sign the confirmation of service. she then stormed off.

five minutes later, at midday I turned up accompanied by two female police officers to explain why the kids weren't with me. we found her at the back of the block at McDonalds. She didn't park her car in the Macca's car park. was it so i wouldn't see the new number plates?

so anyway, showdown for me in a couple of weeks. well the directional hearing. i assume she won't be there. not sure where she is. she hasn't tried ringing the kids at all. and i'd know if she tried to ring, we have a seperate phone line just for her. so no missed calls due to someone else being on the phone.

what will happen there? she won't be at the hearing. i've attempted to serve papers. i don't know her whereabouts or her address. and she's set a precedent with this before. 2000 a location order was made, but it was her her parents address (this was in victoria). they refused to take it. so a substituted service order was granted. they of course spat the dummy.

will i go to court and have a new directional hearing set down? i hope not. i'd like an interim hearing date set whether she's present or not.

any feedback and advice from ZSolicitors would be most appreciated.

Do you really think that I think this is one big joke?

You're the one LOLLING.

Al
30-04-2005, 08:05 PM
You're the one LOLLING.

You've never laughed at a completely fucked situation? Sometimes it's all you *can* do, laugh or cry.

Reprobate
30-04-2005, 08:53 PM
You've never laughed at a completely fucked situation? Sometimes it's all you *can* do, laugh or cry.

Unless the situation can be fixed. You can LOL all you want later.

I've laughed. I've cried. I've thrown up before each and every court appearance.

Reprobate
30-04-2005, 11:33 PM
Stop what you're doing, get off the internet, get rid of Mr Crappy Relationship, and start writing your affidavit.

When I said "Stop what you're doing, get off the internet, get rid of Mr Crappy Relationship, and start writing your affidavit." take it in a way that is soft spoken yet serious.

I don't know you, and I wouldn't want to go through what you're going through. It's not about a battle of the sexes, it's about integrity and character.

Because you're female doesn't make you the enemy. There are as many bastards out there as there are bitches.

What Sagacious and MC SoD have to say is worth listening to.

You owe it to yourself though not to be in a relationship that isn't fulfilling you. I'm remarried now, and my wife is by my side through it all. 9 months and 1 week after getting married we had four kids move in. Under strenous circumstances. But we got through it, and we survived. And we're doing pretty good now. They've loved her from the start. And she's loved them.

I dated quite a few women before meeting Jo. I always had to keep in mind which ones would be right if the friendship went further. Some I dated just for fun. I knew it wasn't going to go anywhere. But I kept them out of my family life.

Some wanted things to progress further. But I wasn't keen. Some of them were great chicks. There were things I could overlook and it would be okay. But I held out for Miss Completely Right.

For your situation seek professional legal help or talk to people who have been in similar situations as you. Not just for a gossip session, but to get some real knowledge and background on the situation.

Check out http://www.lawaccess.nsw.gov.au/

Ring them on 1300 888 529

I don't use a solicitor. I have in the past. And I'm STILL paying off the debt. Now I represent myself, and Law Access is just one of the avenues I check out to give me the extra information I need.

Just quickly checking the site and clicking on Child Abuse to me here:
http://www.lawaccess.nsw.gov.au/HomePageResults.asp?term=HomePage&subbrowse=+Child+Abuse&browse=Children+and+Young%5FPeople

There's also Family Law information at http://www.lawaccess.nsw.gov.au/HomePageResults.asp?term=HomePage&subbrowse=+Family+law+%2D+Children&browse=Family++Law+and+Relationships

Sagacious
30-04-2005, 11:35 PM
I think MC SoD means five years dragging on in and out of courts, not five years for one application. At least that's my impression.

August 2000 it started for me. And once a year the ex gets itchy feet and wants to move interstate. My first court experience was to get her BACK to NSW because she done a disappearing act.

I'm about to go to court AGAIN. But this time I'm in pole position. I have residence of the kids now. Even though the court orders say she does. She willingly handed them over and moved interstate without them. The court orders also state that their residence not be moved from the Newcastle area.

Now she's having a... I won't say a change of heart, she has a black lump of coal in her chest cavity where everyone elses heart would normally be, she's having a change of mind.

Mid May I'm in court for a directional hearing. I made the application. The ex refused to agree to any consent orders. By then it'll be 6 months that the kids have been living with me full time. And in that time she rings once a fortnight if they're lucky. She's sent one postcard to each of them. And she won't give us her actual address in Queensland. Which has made serving her with papers a bit of a hassle. But that was sorted out just recently. In a cruel twist of fate for her.

The kids don't want to go back to her. They don't want to move to Queensland. They don't want to go back to her if she comes down here. And yes, anyone in my position would say that, but in this situation and I believe after a Family Report the court counsellor will also know it to be true.

The ex wanted the kids for the second half of the holidays just gone. But refused to let me know where she would be taking them. So I told her I was refusing to hand them over.

Which of course meant there would be a showdown of the battle of the wills.

She travelled from Far North Queensland to pick up the kids, and a few days before arriving she sent me a letter, outlining the dates that we had agreed on, and stating again that she would not tell me where she was taking them.

So at five minutes to midday i had her served with the court application and affidavits at our arranged meeting place at McDonalds. She blew a gasket and told the server of the documents that she was going to report me to the police for not turning up with the kids (mind you this was five minutes before i was due to arrive). and she took the papers but then tried to give them back. and refused to sign the confirmation of service. she then stormed off.

five minutes later, at midday I turned up accompanied by two female police officers to explain why the kids weren't with me. we found her at the back of the block at McDonalds. She didn't park her car in the Macca's car park. was it so i wouldn't see the new number plates?

so anyway, showdown for me in a couple of weeks. well the directional hearing. i assume she won't be there. not sure where she is. she hasn't tried ringing the kids at all. and i'd know if she tried to ring, we have a seperate phone line just for her. so no missed calls due to someone else being on the phone.

what will happen there? she won't be at the hearing. i've attempted to serve papers. i don't know her whereabouts or her address. and she's set a precedent with this before. 2000 a location order was made, but it was her her parents address (this was in victoria). they refused to take it. so a substituted service order was granted. they of course spat the dummy.

will i go to court and have a new directional hearing set down? i hope not. i'd like an interim hearing date set whether she's present or not.

any feedback and advice from ZSolicitors would be most appreciated.



You're the one LOLLING.

If I were you I'd go armed with an affidavit and an application for substituted service on her parents again given her history of not divulging her address and her lack of contact witht the kids in the last 6 months I'd be setting all of that out in an affidavit too and asking the court to make an interim order until an interim hearing can be had after service upon her of the matrerial via substituted service.

I'd also be asking for directions for filing material in response to the interim application by her.

Then on the next occasion which should be the interim hearing if she turns up she's got to overcome an even more significant status quo (Have a look at a decision of cowling and cowling on http://www.austlii.edu.au under the family court of australia cases. It deals with the approach a court must take when dealing with interim children's issues) if she doesnt turn up then you request that the matter be further adjourned for say 2 to 3 months so that the time continues to build in your favour but make sure you file an affidavit of service of the documents pursuant to the substituted service order. When asking for the adjournment ask if notice of the adjournment can be given in accordance with the previous order for substituted service and also ask for an order that should she fail to appear on the next occasion that you then be at liberty to apply for default orders on a FINAL basis because each court event is an event applicable to both the interim matters listed for that day and also the final application on a case management track.

Also if she does turn up seeking residence and/or contact then make it condfitional upon her providing you with written notice of any change of address and contact details within 72 hours of such change occurring.

Most importantly offer her contact in writing early and as frequent and as long as you can live with (bearing in mind that the children's best interests are the paramount consideration s.65E Family Law Act 1975).

In relation to the relocation issue if she intends on pursuing it have a look at a series of cases starting with Re B (reolcation) followed by AIF v AIM and U v U all available on AUSTLII. Another useful case is Martin v Matruglio but it is somewhat dated now the leading case in the area is AIM v AIF (a relocation approach)

Hope this helps.

Reprobate
30-04-2005, 11:51 PM
If I were you I'd go armed with an affidavit and an application for substituted service on her parents again given her history of not divulging her address and her lack of contact witht the kids in the last 6 months I'd be setting all of that out in an affidavit too and asking the court to make an interim order until an interim hearing can be had after service upon her of the matrerial via substituted service.

I'd also be asking for directions for filing material in response to the interim application by her.

Then on the next occasion which should be the interim hearing if she turns up she's got to overcome an even more significant status quo (Have a look at a decision of cowling and cowling on http://www.austlii.edu.au under the family court of australia cases. It deals with the approach a court must take when dealing with interim children's issues) if she doesnt turn up then you request that the matter be further adjourned for say 2 to 3 months so that the time continues to build in your favour but make sure you file an affidavit of service of the documents pursuant to the substituted service order. When asking for the adjournment ask if notice of the adjournment can be given in accordance with the previous order for substituted service and also ask for an order that should she fail to appear on the next occasion that you then be at liberty to apply for default orders on a FINAL basis because each court event is an event applicable to both the interim matters listed for that day and also the final application on a case management track.

Also if she does turn up seeking residence and/or contact then make it condfitional upon her providing you with written notice of any change of address and contact details within 72 hours of such change occurring.

Most importantly offer her contact in writing early and as frequent and as long as you can live with (bearing in mind that the children's best interests are the paramount consideration s.65E Family Law Act 1975).

In relation to the relocation issue if she intends on pursuing it have a look at a series of cases starting with Re B (reolcation) followed by AIF v AIM and U v U all available on AUSTLII. Another useful case is Martin v Matruglio but it is somewhat dated now the leading case in the area is AIM v AIF (a relocation approach)

Hope this helps.

Okay. My head has just exploded.

I've copied and pasted what you've written here.

I'll print it out.

And then read it perhaps half a dozen times. I'll also get my wife (the new non-evil one) to also read it. Between us we'll figure it out.

Thank you for your time and understanding Sagacious.

Sagacious
01-05-2005, 12:08 AM
Okay. My head has just exploded.

I've copied and pasted what you've written here.

I'll print it out.

And then read it perhaps half a dozen times. I'll also get my wife (the new non-evil one) to also read it. Between us we'll figure it out.

Thank you for your time and understanding Sagacious.
No proble been prepping a property trial and my head just exploded too...I hate translators and I hate German property registrys but what can you do.

Hope you and the sane non evil model wife make some sens of what I've sent you and kick the bejesus out of the insane evil X model.

It is people like her that clog up the system with their game playing and bitch ass fucking around and deny meaningful justice to deserving parties with serious issues to be tried.

here endeth my rant

free legal advice (such as it is) has to be worth some rep

Reprobate
01-05-2005, 12:51 AM
I've read it twice, my wife has read it once, and we've gone through it together to get our heads around it. we've got a few questions to ask...

If I were you I'd go armed with an affidavit and an application for substituted service on her parents again given her history of not divulging her address and her lack of contact witht the kids in the last 6 months I'd be setting all of that out in an affidavit too

Okay, I've filed an affidavit already with my application. I've also since filed the affidavit of service of my friend. I also included another affidavit from myself, because I saw her just after she refused to take the court application and affidavit. Because when I went to explain the reason why I wasn't handing the children over I had a fair idea she'd not want to talk civilly... okay, this is a woman who loses her temper easily. And she's not all that bright. She once said I 'biggalate' her. I'm still not sure what the fuck that word means. So I tried to give her a letter explaining the situation. Which she wouldn't accept either. Her mother was there and said to me "our solicitor has said not to take anything from you".

Not even a court application?

So I guess I need to write an affidavit that deals with and outlines the difficulty of serving her and even trying to find out where she lives. Shall I also mention that Centrelink and Child Support have had difficulty? Because they've asked ME where she is.

And just to quickly note, she's supposed to pay $21 a month child support for 4 kids. Not much, but hey, that's what she's assessed at so I don't (i really don't) have a problem with that. however she didn't pay the first month. She paid only $5 in months two and three (and rung Child Support to say that that's all she's paying that I don't deserve more than that). She hasn't paid since.

but anyway.... shall i get copies of the affidavits of service i filed at court. they're the ONLY thing I don't have copies of. silly me forgot to ask for photocopies. and i'll attach it with my new affidavit.

the thing confusing for me though is "an application for substituted service".

how do i write such a thing? i've asked at court about it before if it's some kind of form. or do i just type something up that i format to look the goods? any tips or words that usually go into something like this?

and asking the court to make an interim order until an interim hearing can be had after service upon her of the matrerial via substituted service.


so i'm asking the magistrate to agree to an order that keeps the status quo in place?

is this like a pre-interim order until the interim hearing takes place? do i ask for that in the directional hearing? or am i asking for it in a hearing between the directional and the interim? and what's that hearing called? i've been to that many hearings i should know, but each time i've gone through this crap 3 times before, not to mention a contravention hearing (i filed it after she stuffed me around and wouldn't let me see the kids for a few weeks) which i also won.

when i needed a location order and substituted service before my solicitor done all that. so i wasn't exposed to the mechanics of it all. but i've got a mediation session on the 9th May and the directional hearing is the 13th May. i should be able to get to see my file from the court counsellor. we had a bit of a problem where a big stack of folders from my files were missing. i was the one that noticed it. the court counsellor chased it up for me and found it in archives down in Melbourne. they forgot to send it back up in 2001.




I'd also be asking for directions for filing material in response to the interim application by her.

when do i ask for this? this is me asking for a chance to respond to her response right? how do i ask for this?



Then on the next occasion which should be the interim hearing if she turns up she's got to overcome an even more significant status quo

that's if she turns up. she's predictably unpredictable. but for the sake of argument we'll assume that she will.

i don't have concerns that the magistrate will overturn the previous ruling that the childrens residence not be moved from Newcastle. i've got a very nice Family Report that is heavily in my favour from 2001. now that was 2001, but it's still relevant, because she certainly hasn't changed since then. as a matter of fact she's done plenty to reinforce what was written in that report that was so favourable to me.

my concern is that she'd decide to move back and then get the kids back in her care. why would she move and then come back? well the kids to her mean money. perhaps she'd get a bit of sympathy from Centrelink who unwittingly discovered that she had been defrauding the system for 4 years.

when i went to sort out the Centrelink stuff i was told by one person to fill out one particular form. Family Tax Benefit. you know that lump sum thing the government handed out? because apparently i was entitled to some of it. i wasn't claiming anything from centrelink at all.

so anyway, when i went there to sort it out with someone in the office i was told "you can't claim that, it says here that you've had the kids 0% of the time for the last 4 years".

hmmmm.

we sorted that out. a stack of stat decs from friends and family who said that they saw me with the kids plenty of times.

the side effect of that was the ex LIED to centrelink. so she got more than what she was entitled to. not so much in the lump sum payment, but in FTB part A and whatnot. multiply that by four years and there's a hefty sum of money that she now owes the government.

so moving back may be an option for her. and i may have accidently thrown some of her secret plans to the wind by not handing the kids over. pure speculation on my part but an interesting story nonetheless. but i won't go into that here. all i'm concerned about right now is facts and protocol.


(Have a look at a decision of cowling and cowling on http://www.austlii.edu.au under the family court of australia cases. It deals with the approach a court must take when dealing with interim children's issues)

i shall have a look. i've heard it before. as a matter of fact one of my former solicitors gave me photocopies of it. i skimmed through it and didn't understand a word of it. but that was a few years ago. i'll give it another shot and see what i can learn.


if she doesnt turn up then you request that the matter be further adjourned for say 2 to 3 months so that the time continues to build in your favour but make sure you file an affidavit of service of the documents pursuant to the substituted service order.

if she doesn't turn up to the directional hearing or the interim hearing?

if it's the interim hearing wouldn't it be better to push to have orders made in her absence?


When asking for the adjournment ask if notice of the adjournment can be given in accordance with the previous order for substituted service...

what does that bit mean?

...and also ask for an order that should she fail to appear on the next occasion that you then be at liberty to apply for default orders on a FINAL basis because each court event is an event applicable to both the interim matters listed for that day and also the final application on a case management track.

so if she doesn't appear at the adjourned and resheduled interim hearing i ask them to wrap the whole thing up because chances are she'll never turn up for the directional hearing anyway?



Most importantly offer her contact in writing early and as frequent and as long as you can live with (bearing in mind that the children's best interests are the paramount consideration s.65E Family Law Act 1975).[QUOTE=Sagacious]

phone contact ain't a problem. i'd like her to ring twice a week. at 7pm at night. but she's ignored all requests for some kind of arrangement like that. when she did ring she'd ring at odd times at any given day. mind you there was 2 to 3 weeks before each call.

i've asked the kids if they want to ring their mother. they've all said no. not to make me happy, just that the times they did talk to her on the phone she'd grill and drill them.

the second last call all four kids had with her prior to the holidays the 8 year old girl asked where she'd be staying when she'll have them for the holdiays. her mother refused to say. "but where?.... no, i want to know now, not later... because i want to know".

this was Miss Eight. i didn't ask or encourage her to say that. she wanted to know.

i was in the next room and i could hear all this and i counted the number of times she asked. 16. and mind you i missed the first 8 or 10.

we had an extra phone line put in specifically for their mother to call them.

and this was a woman who told her kids she'd ring EVERY day. which is a ridiculous thing to promise. you don't want to be a bore to the children. but now the case is 2 to 3 weeks. and since that day at McDonalds there's been NO contact. what shall i do Mothers Day?

she also promised to write to the kids all the time. all they got was a postcard a couple of weeks after she moved to Queensland saying that it's beautiful one day and perfect the next. puh-lease. this is what she wrote! a slogan from an advertising campaign from the freaking 80's.

when i was seperated by distance from the kids living here in newcastle and they were in Victoria i'd write them a letter once a week. and one day a week a phone call. it was hard for me. two calls a week would have been a bit better. but the important thing is there was a routine.

[QUOTE=Sagacious]
In relation to the relocation issue if she intends on pursuing it have a look at a series of cases starting with Re B (reolcation) followed by AIF v AIM and U v U all available on AUSTLII. Another useful case is Martin v Matruglio but it is somewhat dated now the leading case in the area is AIM v AIF (a relocation approach)

okay. i'll check it out.

Hope this helps.

i'd rep ya but i think i've already repped you for something else recently.

The Cunt
01-05-2005, 01:02 AM
If I were you I'd go armed with an affidavit and an application for substituted service on her parents again given her history of not divulging her address and her lack of contact witht the kids in the last 6 months I'd be setting all of that out in an affidavit too and asking the court to make an interim order until an interim hearing can be had after service upon her of the matrerial via substituted service.

I'd also be asking for directions for filing material in response to the interim application by her.

Then on the next occasion which should be the interim hearing if she turns up she's got to overcome an even more significant status quo (Have a look at a decision of cowling and cowling on http://www.austlii.edu.au under the family court of australia cases. It deals with the approach a court must take when dealing with interim children's issues) if she doesnt turn up then you request that the matter be further adjourned for say 2 to 3 months so that the time continues to build in your favour but make sure you file an affidavit of service of the documents pursuant to the substituted service order. When asking for the adjournment ask if notice of the adjournment can be given in accordance with the previous order for substituted service and also ask for an order that should she fail to appear on the next occasion that you then be at liberty to apply for default orders on a FINAL basis because each court event is an event applicable to both the interim matters listed for that day and also the final application on a case management track.

Also if she does turn up seeking residence and/or contact then make it condfitional upon her providing you with written notice of any change of address and contact details within 72 hours of such change occurring.

Most importantly offer her contact in writing early and as frequent and as long as you can live with (bearing in mind that the children's best interests are the paramount consideration s.65E Family Law Act 1975).

In relation to the relocation issue if she intends on pursuing it have a look at a series of cases starting with Re B (reolcation) followed by AIF v AIM and U v U all available on AUSTLII. Another useful case is Martin v Matruglio but it is somewhat dated now the leading case in the area is AIM v AIF (a relocation approach)

Hope this helps.

Someone make this man the mod of the Zgeek Law Forum!

kré
01-05-2005, 01:21 AM
sounds like you keep good company

Reprobate
01-05-2005, 02:19 AM
In relation to the relocation issue if she intends on pursuing it have a look at a series of cases starting with Re B (reolcation) followed by AIF v AIM and U v U all available on AUSTLII. Another useful case is Martin v Matruglio but it is somewhat dated now the leading case in the area is AIM v AIF (a relocation approach)

Hope this helps.

Okay, I've found Martin v Matruglio and Cowling v Cowling and U v U.

Can't find "Re B" and "AIF v AIM". Anything else that may help redefine these searches?

~vjay~
01-05-2005, 11:01 AM
I will have to reread all of that later, my brain doesn't function properly in the morning.

Sagacious
01-05-2005, 11:02 AM
Okay, I've filed an affidavit already with my application. I've also since filed the affidavit of service of my friend. I also included another affidavit from myself, because I saw her just after she refused to take the court application and affidavit. Because when I went to explain the reason why I wasn't handing the children over I had a fair idea she'd not want to talk civilly... okay, this is a woman who loses her temper easily. And she's not all that bright. She once said I 'biggalate' her. I'm still not sure what the fuck that word means. So I tried to give her a letter explaining the situation. Which she wouldn't accept either. Her mother was there and said to me "our solicitor has said not to take anything from you".

Not even a court application?

If she has a solicitor and he has filed material on her behalf in these proceedings then serving her is as simple as sending it to him because in filing any sort of application or response on her behalf he becomes her address for service. If her mother means her mother's family solicitor who did their conveyancing or whatever then ignore her cos that is not her address for service and you are entitled to use reasonable means to effect service on your ex. If the mother meant that she (the mother) wasn't to accept anything from you just ask the court to order that 'service be deemed to be effected 2 business days after posting the documents <and list them> together with a copy of this order <that is the order for substituted service and directions for responding to your application> to <the mother's address> by ordinary prepaid post.'

Your affidavit of service then simply states 'I did on <date> post <list documents posted including Order> together with a letter addressed to the respondent's mother a true copy of which is annexed hereto marked with the letter "A" and a letter to the respondent a true copy of which is annexed hereto and marked with the letter "B"'

and in the letter to the ex dragon in law explain that the court has ordered that service on her daughter be by sending the docs by post to her and that she please ensure that her daughter receives the documents and the letter enclosed addressed to her.

in the letter addressed to einstein tell her you'd like her to ring the kids on mother's day cos as much as it is mother's day the kids feel that they should have contact with her on mother's day abd if she is amenable to physical contact for the day occurring then so much the better. Also spell out that if she agrees to the interim order to let you know in writing but if she doesn't let you know and fails to appear on the appointed date then you will be seeking default orders in terms of your application.



So I guess I need to write an affidavit that deals with and outlines the difficulty of serving her and even trying to find out where she lives.

If she has no solicitor representing her in these proceedings then yes in as much pithy detail as possible. I recommend you search the electoral rolls both state and federal as well and state your results in your affidavit.

Shall I also mention that Centrelink and Child Support have had difficulty? Because they've asked ME where she is.

Absolutely

And just to quickly note, she's supposed to pay $21 a month child support for 4 kids. Not much, but hey, that's what she's assessed at so I don't (i really don't) have a problem with that. however she didn't pay the first month. She paid only $5 in months two and three (and rung Child Support to say that that's all she's paying that I don't deserve more than that). She hasn't paid since.

Make sure you include this in your material annexing copies of any centrelink or CSA statements or correspondence to your affidavit. The Court looks dimmly upon those who do not meet their support obligations to their children particularly if those obligations are not onerous ie. the statutory minimum of $21 per month.

This becomes important in issues where the sharing of the costs of contact are concerned.

but anyway.... shall i get copies of the affidavits of service i filed at court.

No need to serve affidavits of service on anyone else and no need to attach them to your current affidavit if already filed in the court.

the thing confusing for me though is "an application for substituted service".

how do i write such a thing? i've asked at court about it before if it's some kind of form. or do i just type something up that i format to look the goods? any tips or words that usually go into something like this?

The Federal Magistrates Court has a precedent orders document on its website look here (http://www.fmc.gov.au/forms/docs/proforma.pdf)

In relation to the orders you seek for subsitiuted service see above.

so i'm asking the magistrate to agree to an order that keeps the status quo in place?

Yes that is exactly what you are asking for and if she doesn't turn up you are likely to get it (I am assuming this directions hearing is the first court event in this round of proceedings) can you tell me if that is incorrect? and also how did this round of proceedings commence?

is this like a pre-interim order until the interim hearing takes place? do i ask for that in the directional hearing? or am i asking for it in a hearing between the directional and the interim? and what's that hearing called?

Assuming the comments above RE this being the first court event to be correct then the order is usually referred to as an Interim Interim Order pending Interim determination.

You should ask for it at the Directions Hearing. I am assuming that you have not filed any specific interim applications at this point which would have been filed using a Form 2 'Application in a Case' Form along with an affidavit setting out the reasons you want the orders set out in the Form 2.

when i needed a location order and substituted service before my solicitor done all that. so i wasn't exposed to the mechanics of it all. but i've got a mediation session on the 9th May and the directional hearing is the 13th May. i should be able to get to see my file from the court counsellor. we had a bit of a problem where a big stack of folders from my files were missing. i was the one that noticed it. the court counsellor chased it up for me and found it in archives down in Melbourne. they forgot to send it back up in 2001.

The fact you have had to obtain a location and substituted service order previously should strengthen your case for getting one this time.


As for orders made in previous proceedings they are likely to be there along with the documents from previous rounds of court appearances as you are likely to have filed using the same proceeding number.

If not you have either filed in a different registry and need to tell the court about the other proceedings or you have previously been in the Family Court and have now filed in the Federal Magistrates Court or vice versa and you will need to tell the court about the existence of the previous proceedings. THe likelihood in this second scenario is that you will probably havve to get in touch with the court that heard the previous proceedings and get copies of documents off the file this can cost considerable $.


when do i ask for this? this is me asking for a chance to respond to her response right? how do i ask for this?

The response referred to is her response you want rules set out for the time by which she must respond to your material the court will normally give her until about 7 days prior to the return date of the applicaton in question (you should ask for 14 in case there is anything in there you absolutely need to respond to)

Remember interim applications are decided on the uncontested facts that is any fact asserted by the applicant and not denied by the respondent is an uncontested fact and forms the basis of the decision of the Judicial Officer hearing the application.

If she comes out with a whole heap of stuff that is not historical ie. before you got the kids off her (significantly before) or makes allegations directed at denial of contact or obstruction, intimidation etc. then you need to respond.

If she makes allegations that you are not fit as a carer (and if she is stupid she probably will) the Court will ask the rhetorical question if he is so unfit what in heavens name were you leaving the kids with him for (Read between the lines ...shut the fuck up....Next!)

that's if she turns up. she's predictably unpredictable. but for the sake of argument we'll assume that she will.


THe MAgistrate (I am assuming either Federal Magistrate Donald or Coakes) is bound by the doctrine of precedent to follow Cowling. If they are not satisfied that a stable situation (re the kids) is presently in existence then they must make a judgment based on the following sections of the Family LAw Act: s.65E, s.68F(2), and s.60B(2) have a look at those for yourself.

my concern is that she'd decide to move back and then get the kids back in her care. why would she move and then come back? well the kids to her mean money. perhaps she'd get a bit of sympathy from Centrelink who unwittingly discovered that she had been defrauding the system for 4 years.

when i went to sort out the Centrelink stuff i was told by one person to fill out one particular form. Family Tax Benefit. you know that lump sum thing the government handed out? because apparently i was entitled to some of it. i wasn't claiming anything from centrelink at all.



RE her returning and wanting the kids back have a look at a case by the name of Rice v Asplund deals with the revisiting of Orders also available on AUSTLII


if she doesn't turn up to the directional hearing or the interim hearing?

If a no show at the directions hearing then ask for directions for an interim hearing plus an order for subsituted service

If she fronts at the Directions hearing then ask for directions for an interim hearing and because she's there she will either have filed a response or be directed to file a respons as part of those directions.

If she fronts make sure and ask the Fed Magistrate to require her to nominate an address for service to the court there and then given the difficulties in serving her in the past (only do this if she hasn't filed a response by then)

This is all on the assummption that you have kicked off a fresh round of proceedings and have served her with those documents kicking it all off. if this is incorrect then you need to advise so.


if it's the interim hearing wouldn't it be better to push to have orders made in her absence?

The court will usually give her at least one chance through a no show so you will probably be given an adjournment if she doesn't show at the interim and that is why you need to satisfy the court of service of the application on her, ask that on the next occasion if she is a no show that you have leave to apply for final orders by default and also to ask that the notice of adjournment be served on her mother in the same way as the substituted service order allowed



what does that bit mean?

that the notice of adjournment be served on her mother in the same way as the substituted service order allowed



so if she doesn't appear at the adjourned and resheduled interim hearing i ask them to wrap the whole thing up because chances are she'll never turn up for the directional hearing anyway?

yes

phone contact ain't a problem. i'd like her to ring twice a week. at 7pm at night. but she's ignored all requests for some kind of arrangement like that. when she did ring she'd ring at odd times at any given day. mind you there was 2 to 3 weeks before each call.

i've asked the kids if they want to ring their mother. they've all said no. not to make me happy, just that the times they did talk to her on the phone she'd grill and drill them.

the second last call all four kids had with her prior to the holidays the 8 year old girl asked where she'd be staying when she'll have them for the holdiays. her mother refused to say. "but where?.... no, i want to know now, not later... because i want to know".

this was Miss Eight. i didn't ask or encourage her to say that. she wanted to know.

i was in the next room and i could hear all this and i counted the number of times she asked. 16. and mind you i missed the first 8 or 10.

we had an extra phone line put in specifically for their mother to call them.

and this was a woman who told her kids she'd ring EVERY day. which is a ridiculous thing to promise. you don't want to be a bore to the children. but now the case is 2 to 3 weeks. and since that day at McDonalds there's been NO contact. what shall i do Mothers Day?

she also promised to write to the kids all the time. all they got was a postcard a couple of weeks after she moved to Queensland saying that it's beautiful one day and perfect the next. puh-lease. this is what she wrote! a slogan from an advertising campaign from the freaking 80's.

when i was seperated by distance from the kids living here in newcastle and they were in Victoria i'd write them a letter once a week. and one day a week a phone call. it was hard for me. two calls a week would have been a bit better. but the important thing is there was a routine.

Make sure all this info goes before the court and ask that she give you a cointact phone number that the kids can call her on. If you are prepared to make sure the kids get at least one call a week off to her then tell the court you think it's important enough that you make sure it happens (this goes down well with the court) especially given her ...shall we say patchy history re contact.

Also ask the court to order that she gives a postal address so that the kids can send mother's day cards etc to her. An Idea would be to have the kids send mother's day cards to her via grandma and then you can tell the couort that you made that happen if nothing else and that it was done to make the kids feel 'normal' in sending their mum a mother's day card on mother's day.

good luck

Check out the Rules of court on the relevant websites

Family Court http://www.familycourt.gov.au
Federal Magistrates Court http://www.fmc.gov.au

Sagacious
01-05-2005, 11:06 AM
Someone make this man the mod of the Zgeek Law Forum!
No Problemo as long as it is understood that it is general advice only all care and no responsibity and the advice is to start people off on their own train of inquiry and to better equip them in dealing with their own legal advisors.

On that understanding Mod away

MC SoD
02-05-2005, 01:27 PM
Can't find "Re B" and "AIF v AIM". Anything else that may help redefine these searches?

Purely academic, not legal, advice to follow:

B v B (Family Law Reform Act) (1997) 21 Fam LR 676; FLC 92-755

A and A (Relocation Approach) (2000) 26 Family LR 382; FLC 93-035

U v U (2002) 29 Fam LR 74

Just wondering... how good are you at reading these things? They go for ages and it can be hard to work out the "rule" from them unless you've got lots of experience.
That said, if you grab a text book from the library (not sure if local libs have them, or if you are able to access a law lib, but just a suggestion), something like:
Patrick Parkinson and Juliet Behrens, Australian Family Law in Context (Sydney: Law Book Co, 3rd ed, 2004)

Will give a brief intro on each topic, take out the MAIN parts of each decision, then explain it afterwards. Don't know if that's an approach you want to take, but up to you.