Images in sigs

[Kez]

Well I was going to post this a few weeks back when I figured it out, but I've noticed Arcane1 has found out aswell.

I noticed IMG tags are disabled in the sig's, and I'm assuming it's to stop 56k users from being raped by images, and people from fagging up the forums.

There is a way to put images into the sigs. Are we allowed to use this alternative method to chuck small sized images into our signatures? or will we be sodomised by the cock of ZGeek and thrown out onto the street to provide 2 dorrar sucky sucky to the general public if we were to post images in our sigs? :)

Cheers

[dwarfthrower]

I'm sure that if it's really important to the length of your e-wang, then it shouldn't be a problem.

[Kez]

I'm sure that if it's really important to the length of your e-wang, then it shouldn't be a problem.
Ah good, now I can make me E-wang a few more meters long.

[DOGG]

i reckon ban images in sigs. clutters it up too much

[hazza]

images are banned in sigs, but if its really a problem you can disable signatures.

and no dont put images in your sigs. arcane1 or whatever, remove it if u see this thread.

cheers :)

[pavilion]

arcane1's sig sucks dick

[MisterBishi]

arcane1's sig sucks dick
True story.

[Pirate]

Nah, no images in sig files. I fucken hate them.

[Chocoholic]

Nah, no images in sig files. I fucken hate them.
I fucken hate you…..


FUCKEN FUCKEN!!!

[Colonel Kurtz]

Assfarmer.....

[Arcane1]

People Suck. This means you.