Uranium bombing in Iraq contaminates Europe

[DOGG]

Nine days after the start of the American president's 2003 "shock and awe" uranium bombing campaign in Baghdad, an invisible radioactive uranium oxide gas cloud swept through Britain's towns and countryside and throughout Europe.

Respected scientists reported on the unrevealed gas cloud after conducting research on specialized high volume air filters in England. Dr. Chris Busby and Saoirse Morgan stunned Europe in a Sunday Times of London article on Feb. 19, 2006. Their scientific paper, released March 1st, 2006, [1] proved the event. With all the vigor of delusional drunkards, British nuclear and military spokesmen predictably denied the reality of an invisible radioactive cloud.

http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/03/1810728.php

[Nodbugger]

Nice craptastic source. Too bad science says no.

[IamSpartacus]

A few years ago the Uk government announced that restrictions on some Welsh sheep farms were being lifted after the Chernobyl incident in 1986 (that's 20 years ago and some 1500 miles away).

Upon reading further papers, I found out that the restrictions were lifted not because radioactivity was no longer in the food chain .... but the residual amount of radioactivity in Welsh lamb was less than the EU permitted level.

Haven't eaten fucking glow-in-the-dark Welsh lamb since.

[Nodbugger]

A few years ago the Uk government announced that restrictions on some Welsh sheep farms were being lifted after the Chernobyl incident in 1986 (that's 20 years ago and some 1500 miles away).

Upon reading further papers, I found out that the restrictions were lifted not because radioactivity was no longer in the food chain .... but the residual amount of radioactivity in Welsh lamb was less than the EU permitted level.

Haven't eaten fucking glow-in-the-dark Welsh lamb since.

The Uranium in a nuclear reactor is in no way comparable to DU. The Radioactive properties of DU are incredibly minimal, you will get cancer from your TV first.

[DOGG]

If you breathe it in, you will get cancer about 100,000,000 faster than you would from a TV

Besides that,

Nice craptastic source. Too bad science says no.
What sience? You mean these radiation level records which are kept in the UK?

PDF:
http://www.llrc.org/aldermastrept.pdf

HTML:
http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:EiBNzS4_mr4J:www.llrc.org/aldermastrept.pdf+Did+the+use+of+Uranium+weapons+i n+Gulf+War&hl=en&gl=au&ct=clnk&cd=1

There's some science for you turdbrain

Now i'm really not going to bother next time... you whinge about sources rather than reading the actual information contained within the article. and you never bother verifying it externally.

You're a fucking clueless cunt who doesn't know how the world functions.

[Nodbugger]

If you breathe it in, you will get cancer about 100,000,000 faster than you would from a TV

Besides that,


What sience? You mean these radiation level records which are kept in the UK?

PDF:
http://www.llrc.org/aldermastrept.pdf

HTML:
http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:EiBNzS4_mr4J:www.llrc.org/aldermastrept.pdf+Did+the+use+of+Uranium+weapons+i n+Gulf+War&hl=en&gl=au&ct=clnk&cd=1

There's some science for you turdbrain

Now i'm really not going to bother next time... you whinge about sources rather than reading the actual information contained within the article. and you never bother verifying it externally.

You're a fucking clueless cunt who doesn't know how the world functions.


Yes, if you breath it, you will die from breathing in a heavy metal before you would die or get sick from the radiation. Same if you breathed in just about any other metal, but Uranium is insanely dense and the chances of much of it making it very far from the source is almost zero

[DumHed]

unless it was shot out of a cannon for some reason :P

[DOGG]

Yeah... until you read the actual figures and come back to reality. Then things change.

"On impact, uranium penetrators burn fiercely to give an aerosol of sub micron diameter oxide particles which are largely insoluble and remain in the environment for many years."

"we use respiration data on standard man to calculate that each person in the area inhaled some 23 million uranium particles ofdiameter 0.25 microns"

[Nodbugger]

Yeah... until you read the actual figures and come back to reality. Then things change.

"On impact, uranium penetrators burn fiercely to give an aerosol of sub micron diameter oxide particles which are largely insoluble and remain in the environment for many years."

"we use respiration data on standard man to calculate that each person in the area inhaled some 23 million uranium particles ofdiameter 0.25 microns"

Of course they remain in the environment for many years! It is a heavy metal! Aluminum, Iron, every other metal does the same exact thing.

That respiration thing is pretty much bullshit and impossible to calculate.

[DOGG]

It remains in the AIR for many years you bigot.

I don't give a fuck how reliable you think their estimations are. The air filters that collect samples tell the story. Ultra-fine radioactive particles are in the air and people are breating them in.

/end communique... no more BS with you fucking... i got you on ignore for a reason and this is it.

[Nodbugger]

It remains in the AIR for many years you bigot.

I don't give a fuck how reliable you think their estimations are. The air filters that collect samples tell the story. Ultra-fine radioactive particles are in the air and people are breating them in.

/end communique... no more BS with you fucking... i got you on ignore for a reason and this is it.

It is impossible for it to remain in the air in that concentration for very long for more than a few feet away from the point where it became a particle.

Air filters in England will not collect Uranium particles from Iraq.

[AhhDiddums]

Nice craptastic source.

You've argued to me that FOX News is an honest and unbiased source of news and information. Therefore, your opinion on sources being "craptastic" is completely irrelevant, unimportant, and wrong. And no, I refuse to get into another argument about whether or not FOX News is unbiased. I'm willing to look at both sides on things, but on this one, I am right.

[Nodbugger]

You've argued to me that FOX News is an honest and unbiased source of news and information. Therefore, your opinion on sources being "craptastic" is completely irrelevant, unimportant, and wrong. And no, I refuse to get into another argument about whether or not FOX News is unbiased. I'm willing to look at both sides on things, but on this one, I am right.

And you can't give me a shred of proof on the existence of this bias. So fuck off.
Look at the banner on top of this website, they are going to lie every chance they get. Only a retard or a satirist would run this piece of shit website.

[AhhDiddums]

And you can't give me a shred of proof on the existence of this bias.

Well I could, and I believe that I and others have in the past, but I won't bother at this point because proof means nothing to you... its quite evident that you live in your own little bubble, and no level of proof, intelligence, or reason could pop it.





So fuck off.

Trying to be a tough guy? Have a pissy attitude or something? Just because the big bad man says the "f-word," it makes no difference to me. Grow up.





Only a retard or a satirist would run this piece of shit website.

In believing that, it seems that only a "retard or a satirist" would frequent this site and use its message board. Quite interesting.