Cheap Loan | Secured Loans | Fast Loans | Property for sale in Spain | Remortgaging
30 Days of Night [Archive] - ZGeek

PDA

View Full Version : 30 Days of Night


Haggisboy
21-10-2007, 01:19 PM
A dark and nasty force descends on the isolated town of Barrow, Alaska, in the movie 30 Days of Night, and if you thought it was a horde of bloodthirsty vampires you’d only be half right in this paint-by-numbers denture drama that’s heavy on the red corn syrup and devoid of much else.

Heralded by some as the movie that puts the fright factor back in vampires after TV shows like Buffy and Angel turned them into lounge singers, crime fighters and less-than-threatening freaks of the week, 30 Days of Night did little more than vamp my ire at the Hollywood hype machine for marketing a fairly pedestrian big budget B movie as a new and innovative twist on a somewhat forlorn horror genre.

Josh Harnett stars as the uni-browed sheriff of this small Alaskan outpost, isolated from the rest of the state by a lack of roads and inaccessible by sea or (inexplicably) air during the winter months when the northern sun dips below the horizon throwing the town into the titular month long darkness. Thus the stage is set for an all night buffet as a boatload of vampires arrive at sundown and begin draining the town dry.

Based on the graphic novel miniseries by Steve Niles and Ben Templesmith, 30 Days of Night teeters dangerously close to comic absurdity at times, particularly whenever the vampires communicate using a subtitled language that makes them sound like Slavic Chewbaccas with cleft palates. It’s pretty hard to be scared when you’re holding back the giggles as the lead baddie (Danny Huston) barks out something that sounds like “ack wack bubba-duck bokay”.

Director David Slade does a good job trying to keep the story moving, however somewhere along the way, maybe in the screenplay or editing stage, what little that was interesting ends up being given short shrift in the quest to infuse the plot with action.

The enigmatic and talented Ben Foster, last seen chewing up the screen as psycho gunslinger Charlie Prince in 3:10 to Yuma (http://www.zgeek.com/forum/showthread.php?t=70704), is wasted here as a mysterious stranger (seemingly the vampire ship’s human captain – it’s never explained) who wanders into Barrow with the bloodsuckers on his trail.

The result is a film that coalesces into a sort of Northern Exposure meets Night of the Living Dead, with little of what made the latter so terrifying, unless you consider three inch fingernails, bad dentures and blood smeared faces terrifying. In fact, this film contains none of the inventiveness, terror and interesting characters of Near Dark, the brutal 1987 Kathryn Bigelow vampire movie with which some are saying it shares the mantle of genuinely terrifying vampire films.

Yes, a pale “horse” truly does ride into Barrow, Alaska, however in this case the pallor is that of boredom and a poorly realized story, and nothing more.

SOC
27-10-2007, 01:40 AM
I saw this last night, and while I didn't hate it as much as HB, I didn't love it, either. It's a fairly pedestrian affair that could have been so much better. What is good, though, is "Australia's own" Melissa George, who's terrific - she grown into a decent actress during her time in LA...

t101
16-01-2008, 08:44 PM
I saw this a few days ago - bleh. The whole idea of it makes NO sense - the vamps have been hiding, and now they want to start eating without being discovered, yet they start with a rule of no deliberate conversions (kills only), and immediately start losing numbers (yay, shotguns kill vampires now!). What's the point? Even if they successfully ate the town and covered their tracks (BTW, crude oil doesn't explode into flame when you drop a match on it any more than a bitumen road does), there'd be LESS of them than before!

Oh, and a note to any vampires out there - clean your freaking faces! 30 days in and you're still covered in bright red blood, even though pretty much everyone was eaten on day 1?!

I'm bored with vampires anyway, but this one wasn't worth the bandwidth.

Up_All_Night
05-11-2008, 12:13 AM
I too found this disappointing, and the way the story and passing of time was handled was not believable at all. A film called 30 days of nights really needed to show a slow and dangerous and realistic passing of time.

The main gimmick of the film wasn't handled well, coupled with substandard cliche modern vampire incarnation copies which were inferior to most of these sort of films these days. Didn't work.